Machiavelli

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

5 May 2013

Chi fonda in sul populo, fonda in sul fango.

He who builds on the people builds on mud.

Proverb rejected by Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) in Chapter IX of “Il Principe” (The Prince), a handbook for rulers, which endorses the principle that, in politics, the end justifies the means. Machiavelli was a Florentine political theorist and historian. He wrote “Il Principe” in 1513 but it was not published until after his death in 1532.

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Italy, Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Big tent

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

18 April 2013

Those who are not against us are with us.

János Kádár (1956-1988). General Secretary of the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party from 1956 to 1988.

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Hungary, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Boston massacre

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

16 April 2013

DOUBLE STANDARDS

Three people, including a child, were murdered and more than 150 people injured yesterday 15 April 2013 in a cluster bomb attack at the end of a peaceful marathon run in Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

The perpetrator (s) of the attack and the reasons for it remain unknown.

However, the slaughter of innocent people for whatever end is always unjustifiable. The end never justifies the means.

We therefore condemn the attack without reservation.

America is understandably in mourning.  US President Barak Obama has described the attack as “heinous” and “cowardly”.

We agree.

However, only last week a local woman and 10 kids were killed in their home in Kunar province in eastern Afghanistan in an air strike carried out by US-led occupation forces.

At the time, we scoured the media to locate an apology by US President Barack Obama. We found none.

The most we could find was a comment attributed to the occupation forces to the effect that they were aware of “allegations” of civilian casualties in Kunar and were “looking into them”.

In fact, the day the slaughter in Kunar came to light the western press had more to interest it than the killing of local civilians in the east of the country.

That same day US diplomat Anne Smedinghoff  was killed in a suicide bomb in Zabul province in southern Afghanistan. It was this incident, not the killings in Kunar, that attracted the most attention from western media in Afghanistan that day.

In a way, you can understand why.

The butchery of innocent adults and children by western coalition forces in Afghanistan has become so commonplace that it no longer rates even the scanty western media coverage that it might initially have been given.

To grasp why there is a disparity between coverage of civilian  slaughter in countries which the US has invaded and coverage of civilian slaughter in the imperial homeland, you have to grasp one simple easily understood political fact: American lives are worth infinitely more than the lives of other peoples, particularly if the latter speak weird non-English languages, wear turbans or head scarves, and live in two-bit out-of-the-way regions that no one in their right mind would want to set foot in except if they were invading or occupying them.

Think about it.

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Afghanistan, Military, Pakistan, USA | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Sifting the evidence to fit the theory

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

13 April 2013

What the human being is best at doing is interpreting all new information so that their prior conclusions remain intact.

Warren Buffet, “the Sage of Omaha”, US investor (b. 1930).

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Economics, Philosophy, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Get off your backsides!

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

12 April 2013

Don’t confuse analysis with action.

Michael F00t (1913-2010). Leader of the British Labour Party 1980-1983.

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Politics, UK, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ich bin ein Berliner

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

1 April 2013

Is nothing sacred?

No, nothing is sacred.

Or at least that is what the money men would have us believe.

But what about a nation’s heritage, what about the symbols of the soul of the nation, what about the nation’s landscape, its literature, its paintings, its history?

Take Germany, for instance.

The Germans are the Americans of Europe.

Germans tend to go in for modern things. They furnish their houses in a contemporary style. Their cities are modern, forward-looking, efficient.

This is only natural.

Just as America does not have much of a history, since it has not existed for long, so Germany does not have many mementos of its history, since so much was destroyed in the Second World War.

All the more reason, you might think, for treasuring those symbols that have survived.

Moreover, some icons of German history do in fact remain, not least perhaps the discrete remains of the Berlin Wall that separated East and West Berlin in the post-war era of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States.

No fewer than 136 people were shot by East German border guards while trying to escape across the wall to the relatively free world in the west from the Communist dictatorship in East Berlin. Those parts of the wall that remain are a memorial to the escapees and would-be escapees and a grim reminder of what they were escaping from.

On 9 November 1989 the wall was breached in a popular revolt by the people of East Berlin. On 3 October 1990 East and West Germany were united under West Germany hegemony.

The longest remaining length of the wall – a 1.3 kilometre stretch built in 1961 at the height of the Cold War – has been decorated by as many as 120 artists since the fall of Communism. The murals are referred to as the East Side Gallery, the wall having been built just to the east of the line demarcating the East-West border.

However, last week, like thieves in the night, a gang of demolition workers attacked the wall in the small hours and demolished four sections of the East Side Gallery on behalf of a developer who wishes to build high-rise luxury flats near the site.

Preservationists claim that the developer is sacrificing history for profit.

In the London Guardian on 28 March 2013, Kani Alavi, head of an East Side Gallery artists’s group, is quoted as saying: “I can’t believe they came here in the dark in such a sneaky manner. All they see is their money. They have no understanding for the historic relevance and art of this place.”

Ivan McClostney, who moved to Berlin from Ireland a year ago, is quoted as saying: “If you take these parts of the wall away, you take away the soul of the city. This way you make it like every other city.”

Antigone1984:

The business argument is that the past is all very well, but we must pick ourselves up and move on. If we were to remain fixated by the past, they say, how could we progress, how could we innovate, how could we improve?

It is an argument that is certainly persuasive, particularly if we restrict ourselves, for instance, to areas such as  medical progress. The life of man today, from a medical point of view, provided that one lives in the developed world, is infinitely superior to the life one’s ancestors just a hundred years ago.

On the other hand, so far as politics and national history is concerned, can we simply jettison the past? Can we justifiably wipe the slate clean?

There is no one alive in our generation who does not remember the resounding address of US President John F. Kennedy to the people of East and West Berlin within a stone’s throw of the BerlinWall at Schöneberg town hall on 26 June 1963.

This is what Kennedy said:

 “Two thousand years ago the proudest boast was civis Romanus sum”, that is to say, “ I am a Roman citizen”. Today, in the world of freedom, the proudest boast is Ich bin ein Berliner!… All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Berlin, and, therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words Ich bin ein Berliner!”

 

ICH BIN EIN BERLINER

 

Every stone in the Berlin Wall is an incarnation of those words. It is sacred ground. The bulldozers of self-styled progress have no right to demolish it.

 

——-

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Germany, Politics, USA | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Urbi et Orbi

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

Romae, die ultimo mensis Martii,  Anno Domini 2013

 URBI ET ORBI

 Hominibus bonae voluntatis pax sit in terra

Priore anno, in sua oratione pascuali in foro Vaticano pro multitudine centum milium fidelium, Papa Benedictus XVI incitavit pacem in terra atque finem caedis, praecipue in Syria. Tunc numerus hominum in Syria concisorum novem milia fuit.

Hodie, in sua oratione pascuali in foro Vaticano pro multitudine centum milia fidelium, Papa Franciscus I incitavit pacem in terra atque finem caedis, praecipue in Syria. Nunc numerus hominum in Syria concisorum septuaginta milia est.

Quae cum ita sint, incitatio Papae quid valet?

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Italy, Politics, Religion, Syria | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A way out for Cyprus: the courts

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

30 March 2013

The news today is that up to 60 % of savings deposits of over  € 100 000 in Cypriot banks is to be stolen by the Cypriot Government, which has caved in at pistol-point to demands for booty from a triad of international robbers  – the European Commission from Brussels, the European Central Bank from Frankfurt and the US-dominated International Monetary Fund from Washington.

However, as a result of our long acquaintance with the procedures whereby a US-subservient euro-elite has exploited the long-suffering peoples of Europe,  Antigone1984 can point to a solution which could give the bank depositors of Cyprus a significant chance of halting this bank heist in its tracks.

Savers whose bank deposits are in line to be robbed should immediately, either jointly or severally, take action in the Cypriot courts to contest the theft. In particular, they should seek an injunction  to freeze the confiscation of deposits with immediate effect, pending a full court hearing.

The action should be pursued energetically at all levels of appeal up to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg.

In the case of the application for an injunction, since this must be dealt with expeditiously if it is to have any effect, it is quite possible that the legal processes can be got through without undue delay, including the final appeal stage in Luxembourg.

The possibility of a final appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg should also be considered.

As to the likelihood that legal action will be successful, we would suggest that readers consider the following question:

What is the normal court reaction to bank robbers?

Antigone1984:

To our knowledge, Antigone1984 is the first political commentator anywhere to clock the possibility of court action as a means of halting the Great Cypriot Bank Heist.

Readers can check out our earlier posts on this subject at:

A Cypriot shipwreck

Spectacular bank heist in Cyprus

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in Cyprus, Europe, Greece, Politics, USA | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Mutual respect and its polar opposite

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

29 March 2013

AN INJUNCTION: VERSION ONE

Do others for they would do you.

One of the key principles of capitalism as taught in economics faculties and business schools throughout the world, this precept represents the basic modus operandi of free trade, competition between individuals and businesses,  and the market economy.  “Do” here means “swindle”.

AN INJUNCTION: VERSION TWO

Ironically, the wording of the axiom above differs only slightly from an ethical precept with precisely the opposite meaning that is commonly found in religions and belief systems throughout the world.

Consider, for instance, the following passage:

….all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.

From Jesus Christ’s Sermon on the Mount in The Gospel according to St Matthew, Chaper 7, Verse 12. Authorized King James Version of 1611 AD.

Or take this one, with a similar message, from the ancient orient:

子貢問曰「有一言而可以終身行之者乎」子曰「其恕乎 己所不欲 勿施於人。」

[Zi Gong asked: “Is there one word which can serve as a guide of conduct throughout one’s life?” The Master replied: “Is not reciprocity such a word? What you yourself do not want, do not inflict on others.”]

From The Analects of Confucius, Book 15, Section 24.

Confucius (孔子 Kongzi or  孔夫子  Kong Fuzi), referred to in the text as the Master,  was an early Chinese ethical philosopher and peripatetic political adviser, who is said to have lived from 551 to 479 BC.  The work often translated into English under the quaint title of The Analects  ( 論語 in Chinese) is a collection of laconic sayings attributed to Confucius that is thought to have been compiled by his followers some time after his death. The Zi Gong mentioned in the text was a disciple of Confucius.

Antigone1984:

To which of these two versions of the above injunction should the good citizen subscribe today, the version pumped out by the business schools or that commended for millennia by theologians and philosophers?

It’s hardly rocket science.

A no-brainer, really.

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

Posted in China, Israel, Philosophy, Religion | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The market rules, okay?

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

Paris, 27 March 2013

LE GOUVERNEMENT IMPUISSANT FACE À LA MONTÉE DU CHOMAGE

[Government helpless in the face of rising unemployment]

Such was the headline over the lead story in Le Figaro this afternoon when we rocked up in Paris for Easter.

Talk about the bleedin’ obvious!

Newspapers are supposed to publish news, not truisms, aren’t they?

What else did they expect?

Most countries of the world are now paid-up card-carrying members of the globalised market economy.

France, like the other countries of Europe, is no exception.

It is a founding member, moreover, of the regional club of nations known as the European Union (EU), whose raison d’être – excuse my Greek – is the promotion of free market capitalism both within the states that belong to it and in their relations with the rest of the world.

Like the other EU member states, France joined the club willingly and with its eyes wide open. Having joined, it must therefore obey the rules. And, except in exceptional circumstances and for a strictly limited period, those rules exclude state intervention in the economy. In the EU the state – as concretised in a parliament and government elected by the people to represent the nation’s best interests – no longer has the right to interfere with the workings of the national economy. Governments are no longer permitted to plan out the type of economy they consider best for the people that elected them. Least of all can the state intervene itself as an economic actor in its own right (for example, by running industries or providing services). Everything must be left to the market. The market knows best what is good for the country, not the elected representatives of the people.

So it’s no use countries that voluntarily succumbed to the blandishments of free trade complaining about market capitalism when it fails to produce the goods. This is the system they wanted.  Within the straitjacket of the global market, there is nothing they can do about it.

So what has the invisible hand of globalised free trade brought us in the first decade of the twenty-first century? Well, let’s mention just a few things:

–      the near-collapse of the world’s private-sector banking system – which had to be bailed out with trillions of dollars of public money – yes, public money;

–      mass unemployment worldwide;

–      the shrink-down of giant industries hitherto deemed invulnerable (think Motown);

–      the ravaging of the global environment (deforestation of the Amazon basin, tar sand exploitation in the Canadian plains);

–      the exploitation of quasi-slave labour in India and China, countries to which western companies (think Apple or Gap) have shifted production, thus putting hundreds of thousands of people out of work in their home countries;

–      In Europe, the creation, around the turn of the century, of the single currency market  (the eurozone) has brought not the promised milk and honey, but economic collapse (in Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain) and recession elsewhere (in Italy, France and Britain), accompanied inevitably by historic spikes in unemployment (around 26 per cent in Spain and Greece).

And now we arrive back in France to find the country moaning that its government can do nothing about rocketing unemployment.

Give us a break, fellas.

This is what you wanted.

Get over it.

The market rules, okay?

——–

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012) 

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Economics, Europe, France, USA | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment