White best for travelling

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 15 September 2012

If you are not white, perhaps you should think twice about visiting Britain.

Schedule 7 of Britain’s Terrorism Act 2000 allows the police and immigration officers to stop, question and detain for up to nine hours any airline, ferry or train traveller to determine whether they are involved in terrorism.

A British Interior Ministry (Home Office) document published on 12 September 2012 shows that nearly 70 000 travellers were stopped and questioned by security officials under this Act in the year 2011/2012  as they passed through the country’s ports and airports.

Of those stopped and questioned, 60 per cent were from a minority ethnic background, including 29 per cent who were Asian or British Asian.

Of those subsequently detained after initial questioning, 45 per cent were Asians or British Asians, while a further 47 per cent were from a black, Chinese or other non-white background. Only 8 per cent of those detained were white.

A report by Alan Travis in the UK’s Guardian newspaper on 13 September 2012 says:

“People can be targeted by special branch [political security police] under the [Schedule 7] powers without the need for reasonable suspicion that they are involved in any crime. Those who are stopped currently have fewer rights than suspects detained at a police station; they have no access to publicly funded legal advice and failure to answer questions is a criminal offence. They can also be strip-searched and have intimate DNA samples taken from their body.”

The Guardian report goes on to say that Mr David Anderson, the UK Government’s own official reviewer of terrorism legislation, has highlighted the negative impact of these powers on some Muslim communities with many of those stopped feeling they were targeted as Muslims. The effect was to erode trust.

According to the report, the Interior Ministry maintains that these Schedule 7 counter-terrorism powers form an essential part of Britain’s border security arrangements and help to protect the public from those travelling across borders to plan, finance, train for and commit terrorism.

However, the Ministry has now launched a public consultation apparently to determine whether the powers available to the security services under the Terrorism Act 2000 can be scaled back without compromising Britain’s security.

Liberty, a British voluntary organization which champions civil liberties, is said to be about to challenge the Schedule 7 powers in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France.

Antigone1984 comments: We travel frequently to and from Britain. When travellers arrive on British soil, they must run a gauntlet of stony-faced security officials before exiting the security zone at the point of entry.  In our experience, it is invariably the coloured traveller who is yanked from the line and given the third degree.

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

1. Why? or How? That is the question(3 Jan 2012)

2. Partitocracy v. Democracy (20 July 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices(2 Feb 2012)

4. Capitalism in practice  (4 July 2012)

5.Ladder  (21 June 2012)

 6. A tale of two cities (1)  (6 June 2012)

 7. A tale of two cities (2)  (7 June 2012)

 8. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat(31 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

This entry was posted in Police, Politics, UK and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to White best for travelling

  1. aerfen says:

    Given that the percentage of terrorists and drug traffickers is higher among certain ethnic groups it is absolutely right that they be targetted at higher frequency. There *should* be no room for PCness in matters of security, and too much time is already wasted attempting to ”balance’ the numbers by searching blue eyed girls returning from holidays on a Costa, or middle class grannies visiting Franco/British grandchildren.

    And, after all, those that are innocent have nothing to fear, and should welcome the more efficient security that targetted searching could deliver, even though it may involve temporary personal inconvenience. Blame the criminals that created the need for such checks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s