Perfection

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 

3 June 2012

A perfect thing is perfect, whatever its dimensions.

André Maurois (1885-1967). French writer. Extract from The Art of Living (“Un art de vivre”, 1939).

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

Posted in France, Literature | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Wittgenstein

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 2 June 2012

NON SEQUITUR

Die Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung (Tractatus Logic0-Philosophicus) of Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951), published in 1922, contains the following passage (section 6.3631 et seq.):

“It is clear that there are no grounds for believing that the simplest course of events will really happen.

That the sun will rise tomorrow is an hypothesis; and that means that we do not know whether it will rise.

A necessity for one thing to happen because another has happened does not exist…”

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

Posted in Philosophy, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Servants

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 1 June 2012

The reign of Queen Victoria – from 1837 to 1901 – saw the heyday of the English servant. In those much-missed halcyon days maids and lackeys were two a penny. Nobody had any difficulty finding domestic staff. Besides, the common people knew their place: a forelock was there for tugging. But things have gone downhill rapidly ever since. As everybody knows, it is increasingly difficult to find servants these days.  Why, it appears that some unfortunates are reduced to cooking their own meals and even – good heavens! – doing their own cleaning. Fortunately, standards are still kept up in some parts of this sceptred isle. Take the Duke of Devonshire, for instance. He has a nice pad in Derbyshire. You might ask, why not Devonshire? But then that’s the way with England’s eccentric upper-class. They do things differently. So Derbyshire it is. The Duke’s “seat” – that is what you call a house if it is too big to see from one end of it to the other without binoculars – is called Chatsworth. Nor did the Duke buy his stately pile yesterday. Chatsworth has been home to the Duke’s family, the Cavendishes, since 1549. It has 126 rooms and is set in parkland of about 1000 acres. So you can see why His Grace needs to employ 700 servants. Who said England has gone to the dogs! Not in Derbyshire, it ain’t.

 ——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

Posted in UK | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Not walking the talk

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

31 May 2012

ONE LAW FOR THE RICH, ANOTHER FOR THE POOR

The Greeks don’t seem to want to pay their taxes.

Christine Lagarde, director-general of the International Monetary Fund, has ordered them to do so.

Christine Lagarde has an annual salary of £300, 000 – that is to say,  $460, ooo or €374,000.

Christine Largarde’s salary is tax-free.

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

Posted in France, Greece, UN | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Paris in the springtime

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 

Paris, 30 May 2012

PARIS IN THE SPRINGTIME

 

► 1:52

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF_yN1R2b5M

 

Back in Paris.  Coming home, so to speak. Click on the arrow to the left above to hear Frank Sinatra singing the Cole Porter lyrics.

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

 

Posted in France | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Arrivederci, Roma!

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 

Rome, 29 May 2012

 

ARRIVADERCI, ROMA!

 

 

 

► 2:31


 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-prQ8AE_nvY

 

If you click on the arrow above to the left, you can hear US actor and vocalist Mario Lanza singing the signature tune of the 1958 Italo-American film “Arrivederci Roma” (released in monoglot America as “Seven Hills of Rome”).

 

The scene is the Piazza Navona (the classical Stadium of Domitian) in the historic heart of the Italian capital. Lanza is sitting by a fountain with a young girl street urchin who takes up the refrain.  Apparently, the star had encountered the youngster while on location in Rome and had insisted on her appearing in the film. Interestingly, the fountain chosen for the backdrop is not the world-famous Fountain of the Four Rivers by Gianlorenzo Bernini in the centre of the Piazza but the lesser Fountain of Neptune by Giacomo della Porta in the north of the Piazza.

 

The lyrics of the song – in Roman dialect – are as follows:

 

T’invidio turista che arrivi,

t’imbevi de fori e de scavi,

poi tutto d’un colpo te trovi

fontana de Trevi ch’e tutta pe’ te!

 

Ce sta ‘na leggenda romana

legata a ‘sta vecchia fontana

per cui se ce butti un soldino

costringi er destino a fatte tornà.

 

E mentre er soldo bacia er fontanone

la tua canzone in fondo è questa qua!

 

Arrivederci, Roma…

Good bye…au revoir…

Si ritrova a pranzo a Squarciarelli

fettuccine e vino dei Castelli

come ai tempi belli che Pinelli immortalò!

 

Arrivederci, Roma…

Good bye…au revoir…

Si rivede a spasso in carozzella

e ripenza a quella “ciumachella”

ch’era tanto bellae che gli ha detto sempre “no!”

 

Stasera la vecchia fontana

racconta la solita luna

la storia vicina e lontana

di quella inglesina col naso all’insù

 

Io qui, proprio qui l’ho incontrata…

E qui…proprio qui l’ho baciata…

Lei qui con la voce smarrita

m’ha detto:”E’ finita ritorno lassù!”

 

Ma prima di partire l’inglesina

buttò la monetina e sussurrò:

 

Arrivederci, Roma…

Good bye…au revoir…

Voglio ritornare in via Margutta

voglio rivedere la soffitta

dove m’hai tenuta stretta stretta accanto a te!

 

Arrivederci, Roma…

Non so scordarti più…

Porto in Inghilterra i tuoi tramonti

porto a Londra Trinità dei monti,

porto nel mio cuore i giuramenti e gli “I love you!”

 

Arrivederci, Roma…

Good bye…au revoir…

Mentre l’inglesina s’allontana

un ragazzinetto s’avvicina

va nella fontana pesca un soldo se ne va!

Arrivederci, Roma!

 

The song was composed by Renato Rascel with lyrics by Pietro Garinei and Sandro Giovannini. The film was directed by Roy Rowland, produced by Lester Welch and distributed by Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer. Screenplay was by Art Cohn and Giorgio Prosperi based on a plot by Giuseppe Amato.

 

 

The incident-packed plot proceeds along the following romantic lines:

 

 

Il popolare cantante americano Marc Revere (interpretato da Mario Lanza) si reca in Italia per rintracciare la fidanzata Carol Ralston (Peggie Castle), che lo ha piantato dopo un litigio. Dopo aver perso tutti i suoi soldi al Casinò decide di recarsi a Roma, dove vive suo cugino Pepe Bonelli (Renato Rascel), musicista in un teatrino di varietà. Sul treno incontra la giovane Raffaella Marini (Marisa Allasio), che intende trasferirsi dallo zio. All’arrivo Raffaella apprende che lo zio è emigrato in Sudamerica anni prima, e così accetta l’invito di Marc e Pepe a fermarsi da loro per qualche giorno. Tra Marc e Raffaella nasce un sentimento di reciproca attrazione, ma sul più bello riappare Carol, e le cose si complicano…

 

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

 

Posted in Italy, USA | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Papal woes

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

Rome, 28 May 2012

The Pope’s personal butler Paolo Gabriele is alleged to have been caught with his fingers in the till. For the past three days he has been languishing in a tiny cell while subjected to relentless questioning by the Gendarmeria, the Vatican police.

Official comment by the Vatican has been characteristically scarce.

As a result, leaks have abounded and the Italian media have given the story saturation coverage. The alleged charge against Gabriele is that he sold confidential Vatican documents for filthy lucre.

The Gendarmeria has raided Gabriele’s home and taken away four crates of material.

The search is on now for Gabriele’s accomplices who are thought to be, like himself, Vatican employees. According to the Italian presss, a young married woman is said to be involved.

It has also been suggested that Gabriele may have  “protected” by a highly placed Vatican official.

On the other hand, he may be completely innocent as he has not been formally charged, let alone convicted of any offence.

Alongside the Gabriele story, the Italian media have also suggested that accounts are currently being settled between two cardinals involved in the management of the Papal government: Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Vatican Secretary of State, and Cardinal Attilio Nicora, President of the Vatican’s Financial Information Authority.

Only last week Ettore Gotti Tedeschi,  President of the Vatican’s Institute of Religious Works, a financial body, had to resign after the Board of the Vatican Bank passed a vote of no-confidence him.

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

 

Posted in Italy | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Viator infelix

Rome, 27 May 2012

The self-doubting, personally insecure, English poet Arthur Hugh Clough (1819-1861) was an unhappy tourist in Rome in 1849. Like most educated Victorians, Clough was very much preoccupied by religion, which to him and his contemporaries meant a basic loyalty to the stripped-down Christianity of the Anglican Church and an English distaste for the pomp and ceremony of what they satirised as “the Scarlet Woman” of Papal Rome. Clough wrote a long poem “Amours de Voyage” based on his experiences during his visit to Rome.  The following extracts from the poem show how disoriented he was there. The poem is divided into five cantos and much of it takes the form of letters sent by “Claude” (the fictional character who represents Clough himself) from Rome to a friend called “Eustace” back in England.

Canto I, Section I. CLAUDE TO EUSTACE.

Dear Eustatio, I write that you may write me an answer,


Or at the least to put us again en rapport with each other.


Rome disappoints me much, St. Peter’s, perhaps, in especial;


Only the Arch of Titus and view from the Lateran please me:


This, however, perhaps is the weather, which truly is horrid….


Rome disappoints me much; I hardly as yet understand, but


Rubbishy seems the word that most exactly would suit it.


All the foolish destructions, and all the sillier savings,


All the incongruous things of past incompatible ages,


Seem to be treasured up here to make fools of present and future.


Would to Heaven the old Goths had made a cleaner sweep of it!


Would to Heaven some new ones would come and destroy these churches!


However, one can live in Rome as also in London.


It is a blessing, no doubt, to be rid, at least for a time, of


All one’s friends and relations, yourself (forgive me!) included,


All the assujettissement of having been what one has been,


What one thinks one is, or thinks that others suppose one…

 

Canto 1, Section II. CLAUDE TO EUSTACE.

Rome disappoints me still; but I shrink and adapt myself to it.


Somehow a tyrannous sense of a superincumbent oppression


Still, wherever I go, accompanies ever, and makes me


Feel like a tree (shall I say?) buried under a ruin of brickwork.


Rome, believe me, my friend, is like its own Monte Testaceo,


Merely a marvellous mass of broken and castaway wine-pots.


Ye gods! what do I want with this rubbish of ages departed,


Things that nature abhors, the experiments that she has failed in?


What do I find in the Forum? An archway and two or three pillars.


Well, but St. Peter’s? Alas, Bernini has filled it with sculpture!


No one can cavil, I grant, at the size of the great Coliseum.


Doubtless the notion of grand and capacious and massive amusement,


This the old Romans had; but tell me, is this an idea?


Yet of solidity much, but of splendour little is extant:


‘Brickwork I found thee, and marble I left thee!’ their Emperor vaunted;


‘Marble I thought thee, and brickwork I find thee!’ the Tourist may answer.

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

Posted in Italy, Literature, UK | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SPQR

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 Rome, 26 May 2012

Everywhere you go in Rome you come across the abbreviation SPQR. You find it in municipal documents, on street furniture (manhole covers, litter bins, etc), and even chiselled on the stone plinths of statues in the Campdoglio, the piazza on Capitol hill designed by Michelangelo, where stands the Palazzo Senatorio (Rome’s City Hall) overlooking the ruins of the Roman Forum. In classical times, the abbreviation appeared on coins and was emblazoned on the standards of the Roman legions. Cicero used the term frequently, as did Livy. In the 20th century Mussolini had the initials engraved on public buildings in an attempt to give gravitas and pedigree to his dictatorship.

The initials SPQR stand for the words:

Senatus Populusque Romanus

which translates into English as:

“The Senate and the Roman People” or “The Senate and the People of Rome”.

However, provincial Italians, who have a strong patriotic attachment to their own regions and resent the dominance of Rome, have had a go at the capital by suggesting that the initials in fact represent the following modern Italian words:

Sono Pazzi Quei Romani

Which c0mes out English as:

“They are mad, those Romans.”

And there is a less kind version still:

Sono Porci Quei Romani

Of which the English translation is:

“They are pigs, those Romans.”

 

Not very nice, it must be said. Speaking personally, we have never met a Roman who was not the personification of charm and courtesy. Whether they are mad or not, it is not for us to say.

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

 

Posted in Italy | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Love town

Editorial note: If you have not yet read our mission statement above, please do so in order that you can put our blogs in context. 

 Rome, 25 May 2012

 

R                                                                                                 A

     O                                            =                                       M

         M                                                                            O

             A                                                                    R

——————

 You might perhaps care to view some of our earlier posts.  For instance:

 1. Why? or How? That is the question (3 Jan 2012)

2. Das Vierte Reich/The Fourth Reich (6 Feb 2012)

3. The shoddiest possible goods at the highest possible prices (2 Feb 2012)

4. Where’s the beef? Ontology and tinned meat (31 Jan 2012)

5. What would Gandhi have said? (30 Jan 2012)

Every so often we shall change this sample of previously published posts.

——————

Posted in Italy | Tagged , | Leave a comment